Hey guys,
I finally photographed my recent sketchbook activity. It always great to have a huge post with a lot of sketches, drawings and paintings. So here it goes:
What started out as INK-tober (one ink-drawing a day for the whole October) changed into face-tober for me. I was reading "Creative Illustration" by Andrew Loomis and I think pretty close to the end he writes: "get used to drawing a face every day". So I did.
I didn't flesh them all out, some are better than others, but I still did it. I changed from pencil, to ink to water-color, to digital, to colored pencils and back, to switch things up. What I found was, that once started, the urge to make it better and better grew from day to day. And more so when not doing digital work. I don't know what it is, but working with traditional media takes away the pressure to make it look photoreal, I guess. And photoreal is what I usually shoot for in studies, not that I am hitting that goal every time. So then I tried to get rid of that pressure, to more enjoy the studies, since enjoying something makes it easier to learn from it, or so I read. So I kept the digital studies looser sometimes or left brushmarks showing.
Anyway I do like my new little habbit, I hope you find something you like too.
I learned that a lot of times, my placement of features was off. Especially in the beginning. It got better, by doing more guidelines, like horizontal or vertical lines going out from one feature. Doing them mentally sometimes is enough. Again I found that I had more resistance doing guidelines in digital, don't know why that is.
I finally photographed my recent sketchbook activity. It always great to have a huge post with a lot of sketches, drawings and paintings. So here it goes:
What started out as INK-tober (one ink-drawing a day for the whole October) changed into face-tober for me. I was reading "Creative Illustration" by Andrew Loomis and I think pretty close to the end he writes: "get used to drawing a face every day". So I did.
I didn't flesh them all out, some are better than others, but I still did it. I changed from pencil, to ink to water-color, to digital, to colored pencils and back, to switch things up. What I found was, that once started, the urge to make it better and better grew from day to day. And more so when not doing digital work. I don't know what it is, but working with traditional media takes away the pressure to make it look photoreal, I guess. And photoreal is what I usually shoot for in studies, not that I am hitting that goal every time. So then I tried to get rid of that pressure, to more enjoy the studies, since enjoying something makes it easier to learn from it, or so I read. So I kept the digital studies looser sometimes or left brushmarks showing.
Anyway I do like my new little habbit, I hope you find something you like too.
I learned that a lot of times, my placement of features was off. Especially in the beginning. It got better, by doing more guidelines, like horizontal or vertical lines going out from one feature. Doing them mentally sometimes is enough. Again I found that I had more resistance doing guidelines in digital, don't know why that is.
Here the digital portraits / studies of faces.
A Richard Schmidt step by step study.
These are all the water-color-paintings I did so far in Chile. Ida "helped" with the portrait of the lady at the very end. Most are from life, colors are fun ;)
Reference taken from:
http://portraitsfordrawing.tumblr.com/
http://artistsnetworks.com/tutorials/portrait_demo.html
http://www.alexhays.com/loomis/Andrew%20Loomis%20-%20Creative.Illustration.pdf
http://portraitsfordrawing.tumblr.com/
http://artistsnetworks.com/tutorials/portrait_demo.html
http://www.alexhays.com/loomis/Andrew%20Loomis%20-%20Creative.Illustration.pdf
RSS Feed
